Tunisia: Behind
the Western mask
Khaled
Hroub | International Herald Tribune
Friday, November 19, 2004
CAMBRIDGE,
England
Until
recently, people wanting to use Tunisian Internet cafes, which are owned or
supervised directly or indirectly by the state, were asked to present ID cards
or their addresses. It is ironic, then, that Tunis succeeded in attracting the world's most
prestigious summit on the free exchange of information.
Tunisia is a
small and quiet country that is hardly ever in the news. Since 1987, when the
current president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, took power in a bloodless palace
coup, the state has staged presidential referendums every five years, the latest
on Oct. 24.
A cynic might say that its result - 94.5 of the electorate
in favor of the standing regime - represents a huge leap toward "political
liberalization" compared with results of the earlier polls: 99.4 percent for the
regime in 1989, 99.7 percent in 1994 and 99.5 percent in
1999.
There
has been scant reporting on this theatrical state of affairs by Arab media, most
surprisingly by Al Jazeera. The regime has been highly successful in silencing
not only the national press but also regional media. On Al Jazeera alone, at
least three programs have been canceled before their scheduled broadcast after
pressure from Tunis.
Unfortunately,
this is normality in an authoritarian third-world setting. What is amazingly
abnormal, however, is that such authoritarianism was rewarded by being allowed
to host the second round of the World Summit on the Information Society earlier
this week.
In the
summit's first round in Geneva, participants - including Tunisia - declared
their "common desire and commitment to build a people-centered, inclusive and
development-oriented Information Society, where everyone can create, access,
utilize and share information and knowledge ... premised on the purposes and
principles of the Charter of the United Nations and respecting fully upholding
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights." Meanwhile the government's silencing
of the national press has deprived its political opposition of even the smallest
opening to express critical views.
Ben Ali's Tunisia is a
bizarre story. On the one hand the state has succeeded in projecting a polished
image, proclaiming secularism, democracy and modernity with the loudest of
noise. These values have, of course, their "Tunisian versions" and
"specificities" that often strip them of meaning and substance. Using such
"values" Ben Ali won two constitutional amendments allowing him to extend his
term in office.
According
to human rights organizations, the state under the "Tunisian model of democracy"
has exercised the most oppressive measures against the most basic of human
rights. Meanwhile, Washington has allocated to
Tunis the
regional offices of its Middle East Partnership Initiative, meant to spread
democratization throughout the Arab world.
The
state security apparatus has rapidly built a draconian structure unique in the
region. Seemingly impervious to the mounting criticism of Western human rights
groups, the regime is extremely sensitive to the Arabic press. Accordingly,
Tunisian ambassadors across the Arab world have been working more as censorship
officials than diplomats.
Filing
complaints and threatening to cut off diplomatic relations for the tiniest of
issues has been standard practice of overworked Tunisian officials. If a
newspaper, even in discussing apolitical issues having nothing to do with
Tunisia, interviewed a member of the opposition from inside or outside Tunisia,
its editor would be bombarded by all kinds of attacks and pressures. Tunisian
diplomats would raise the issue with the highest-ranking people in the country
that had power over that newspaper.
Anecdotes
in Arab media circles about Tunisian intimidation and ultrasensitivity are
amazing. A number of Arab thinkers, for example, were not allowed to attend
seminars in Tunisia because they had befriended
Tunisian thinkers who are hated by the regime or had co-authored publications
with them.
How
has Tunis
managed this sleight of hand? By emphasizing secular discourse, the regime has
offered the West a comfortable illusion. It is not the secularism of the
Baathist regimes of Syria and
pre-invasion Iraq. Nor is it the secularism of the
monarchies of Jordan or
Morocco, marred as they are by the
principle of heredity. Here we have a republic that is westernized in its
political positions and in the socio-cultural program of its elite, with extra
doses of "democracy" jargon.
For
many Western governments Tunisia has been a promising example
of an evolving modern and democratic state. During the 1990s Ben Ali's regime
was deservedly given credit by most international economic institutions for
impressive improvement in Tunisia's economic ranking. Yet an
increasingly political authoritarianism has developed in tandem with economic
liberalization and improvement, offsetting what would have been an otherwise
truly successful model.